|
同位語還是定語 | |||
作者:劉青沅 文章來源:本站原創 點擊數: 更新時間:2013/1/31 |
|
||
說明:引用此文請注明出處,并務請保留后面的有效鏈接地址,謝謝!
三、廣義上看,也可以理解為同位語 為了分析各類同位語的“變體”,《英語語法大全》在17.70節又列舉了各不同類型組合的同位語: 部分的(partial)——只有一個成分可以省略 同位關系 微弱的(weak)——不同的句法類 限制性的(restrictive)——相同的信息單位 同時該書舉例如下: (i) FULL, STRICT, NONRESTRICTIVE 完全、嚴格、非限制性的同位語。如: Paul Jones, the distinguished art critic, died in his sleep last night. (ii) FULL, WEAK, NONRESTRICTIVE 完全、微弱、非限制性的同位語。如: Playing foothall, his only interest in life, has brought him many friends. (iii) FULL, STRICT, RESTRICTIVE 完全、嚴格、限制性的同位語。如: My friend Anna was here last night. (iv) FULL, WEAK, RESTRICTIVE 完全、微弱、限制性的同位語。如: The question whether to confess or not troubled the girl. (v) PARTIAL, STRICT, NONRESTRICTIVE 部分、嚴格、非限制性的同位語。如: An unusual present was given to him for his birthday, a book on ethics. (vi) PARTIAL, WEAK, NONRESTRICTIVE 部分、微弱、非限制性的同位語。如: His explanation, that he couldn’t see the car, is unsatisfactory. (vii) PARTIAL, STRICT, RESTRICTIVE 部分、嚴格、限制性的同位語。如: Next Saturday, financial expert Tom Timber will begin writing a weekly column on the national economy. (viii) PARTIAL, WEAK, RESTRICTIVE 部分、微弱、限制性的同位語。如: His explanation that he couldn’t see the car was unconvincing. 我們現在來看看前面問題中的句子: 為便于表述,我們指定: A= B=the first sign of long-awaited progress after a senior official had promised to modify the controversial re-education-through-labor system 對照以上說明,我們認為前面問題中的句子可視為“部分、微弱、非限制性”同位語,因為(www.hz123456.com): (i) 如果省略A,B不是一個可接受的句子;如果省略B,A是一個可接受的句子。也就是說,A和B中只能省略一個,故它屬“部分同位語”。 (ii) A和B當中,一個是句子,一個是名詞短語,顯然是“不相同的句法類”,故它屬“微弱的同位語”。 (iii) 至于限制性與非限制性,很顯然它是非限制性。 |
|||
文章錄入:admin 責任編輯:admin | |||
【發表評論】【加入收藏】【告訴好友】【打印此文】【關閉窗口】 |
|
||||||
| 網站地圖 | 版權申明 | 設為首頁 | 加入收藏 | 會員中心 | 取回密碼 | 友情鏈接 | 用戶留言 | 管理登錄 | ||||
|